Credibility+of+Sources

Please use the following resources to evaluate your internet sources regarding the economic stimulu

[|Evaluate_the_reliability_of_sources.doc]

[|Rating_Research_Sources.doc] Weaknesses Strengths Added by Phillip Brown
 * **Credibility** || The source lacks a reliable IP adress. It is not a ".org" it is a ".com" which can be known to lead to faulse information and unknown sources. || The source is straight from LA times which also has a version of a magazine. The fact that the magazine is published and edited gives the source more credability and reliability to the website despite the fact that it is a ".com" web adress. ||
 * **Accuracy** ||  || All information is accurate due to the fact that it checks up with more than one website. Information is up to the date that researched. Research is talking about stimulus package and future benefits that have not happened so very up to date. www.cbnn.com also checks with the same information as well as other sources listed on wikispaces from other individuals ||
 * **Reasonableness** ||  || Information is very reasonable. numbers seem to be reasonable (13 week UI extension/ 4 million jobs created) numbers are within a few hundred from other sources. NO OUTLIERS ||
 * **Support** ||  || cbnn.com/arcticles.latimes.com/cnn.com all have related numbers and information on unemployment and the stimulus package. ||